MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061293585 · doi:10.1177/0091270003262951

Rheumatoid Arthritis Does Not Reduce the Pharmacodynamic Response to Valsartan

2004· article· en· W2061293585 on OpenAlexaff
Noriko Daneshtalab, Richard Lewanczuk, Anthony S. Russell, Fakhreddin Jamali

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRheumatoid arthritisValsartanMedicinePharmacodynamicsInflammationPharmacologyInternal medicineArthritisPharmacokineticsTumor necrosis factor alphaEndocrinologyBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inflammatory conditions decrease the cardiovascular response to calcium channel and beta-adrenergics blockers due, likely, to down-regulation of the receptors mediated by pro-inflammatory mediators such as C-reactive protein (CRP), nitric oxide (NO), and tumor necrosis factor. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether down-regulation is also evident in angiotensin II type 1 receptors (AT(1)R) during varying inflammatory states. Normotensive subjects were divided into three groups according to the severity of disease: 14 with active rheumatoid arthritis, 12 with controlled rheumatoid arthritis, and 12 healthy control subjects. The AT(1)R antagonist valsartan (160 mg) was given to all the subjects, and blood samples were taken for pharmacokinetic analysis. The systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures were determined at all blood collection times. The degree of inflammation was measured using joint swelling, NO, and CRP. Plasma valsartan concentration was measured using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Patients with active disease had significantly higher joint swelling, NO, and CRP than other groups. Plasma valsartan concentration-time curves were remarkably similar in all groups. No reduced response was noticed. Our preliminary observation suggests a need for further studies to examine the possibility of AT(1)R antagonists as alternatives to other cardiovascular drugs so that their potency may be reduced by inflammation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Clinical PharmacologySame topicReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingFrench-language works237,207