Venous invasion in oesophageal adenocarcinoma: enhanced detection using elastic stain and association with adverse histological features and clinical outcomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: In oesophageal adenocarcinoma, detection rates of venous invasion using haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and elastic stains have not been compared. The aims of this study were to investigate whether or not elastic stains facilitate the detection of venous invasion, and to determine the prognostic significance of venous invasion following review with elastic stains. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and three resection specimens containing oesophageal adenocarcinoma, all reported originally as negative for venous invasion, were examined for the presence of venous invasion using H&E and subsequently Movat pentachrome stains. Venous invasion was detected in eight cases with H&E and an additional 66 cases using Movat pentachrome; overall, 72% of cases contained venous invasion. Venous invasion was associated with advanced stage, tumour size, lymphatic and perineural invasion and subsequent distant metastases. Venous invasion, stage, size, grade, lymphatic invasion and perineural invasion were prognostically significant on univariate analysis. Only tumour stage was independently prognostic. Two of eight patients with venous invasion but no other indication for adjuvant treatment died of recurrent disease. CONCLUSIONS: Elastic stains improve detection of venous invasion significantly in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Venous invasion is associated with multiple adverse clinicopathological features. Its identification may facilitate the stratification of patients at risk for visceral metastases and disease-related death.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".