MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061372016 · doi:10.1116/1.2975196

Fabrication of surface plasmon waveguides and integrated components on ultrathin freestanding membranes

2008· article· en· W2061372016 on OpenAlexaff
Pierre Berini, Nancy Lahoud, Robert Charbonneau

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development CanadaChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFabricationWaveguideMaterials scienceSurface plasmon polaritonAstronomical interferometerSubstrate (aquarium)PlasmonOptoelectronicsOpticsSurface plasmonNanotechnologyInterferometryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fabrication and physical characterisation of waveguides and integrated components on freestanding membranes are described. The waveguides consist of a thin (20–25nm) narrow (∼5μm) Au∕Cr stripe, on an ultrathin (20–30nm) large-area (∼1mm2) freestanding Si3N4 membrane clamped around its perimeter to an underlying Si substrate. The integrated components are implemented with this waveguide and consist of Mach-Zehnder interferometers and couplers. The waveguide and components are dimensioned such that they propagate long-range surface plasmon-polariton waves in a vacuum (air) or H2O background. The fabrication process flow adopted and some specific process steps are described. Physical characterisation was conducted on structures having undergone intermediate process steps and on finished structures, and characterisation results are given and discussed. The structures were found to be robust enough for careful use, and to routinely sustain ∼3μN of point force without shattering.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and FilmsSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207