Increased peripheral resistance in heart failure: new evidence suggests an alteration in vascular smooth muscle function
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Increased peripheral resistance is a hallmark of chronic heart failure and has been primarily attributed to neurohumoral pathways involving both the renin-angiotensin and sympathetic nervous systems. The increased resistance is thought to serve as a compensatory mechanism to help maintain perfusion to the vital organs by sustaining blood pressure in the fate of a failing heart. Local mechanisms, and in particular endothelial dysfunction, have also been shown to be important contributors in regulating arterial resistance and vascular remodeling in this disease. In this issue of the British Journal of Pharmacology, Gschwend et al. (2003) present new data suggesting that in the absence of a functional endothelium, myogenic constriction of small pressurized mesenteric arteries, an intrinsic property of vascular smooth muscle cells, is enhanced in a coronary artery ligation-induced myocardial infarction model of congestive heart failure (CHF) in the rat. The increased myogenic tone appears to be tightly linked to angiotensin II type 1 receptors (AT(1)). The possibility that CHF-induced stimulation of myogenic constriction is due to the local release of preformed angiotensin II or constitutive upregulation of the AT(1) receptor signaling pathways are discussed along with other potential cellular and molecular mechanisms previously suggested to play a role in myogenic reactivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".