MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061447329 · doi:10.4314/wajm.v24i4.28223

Esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula and early postoperative mortality

2006· article· en· W2061447329 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Talal Al-Malki, Ashraf Ibrahim

Bibliographic record

VenueWest African Journal of Medicine · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEsophageal and GI Pathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTracheoesophageal fistulaAtresiaSepsisPneumoniaMortality ratePresentation (obstetrics)PediatricsSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Several recent reports showed that associated anomalies represent the main cause of postoperative mortality in infants born with esophageal atresia (EA) and/or tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF). Our observations present additional causes of mortality to the above mentioned. The aim of this study is to identify the major causes of early postoperative mortality in cases of EA and/or TEF in our setup. The ongoing preoperative classifications predicting mortality will be also used for comparison. Patients and methods: We reviewed 101 charts of all cases with EA and/or TEF in a period of 11 years from 1990 to 2000. Morbidity and causes of postoperative mortality during the first admissions were identified. The factors predicting mortality were documented. Patients were classified according to Waterston, Montreal and Spitz classifications. Results: Thirty-one patients (30.7%) died. Two main groups of post operative mortality were identified. The first group included the possibly avoidable causes of mortality which were primary sepsis (n=10, 32.3%), technical problems (n=8,25.8%) and severe pneumonia (n=5,16.1%). The unavoidable causes of mortality included major congenital anomalies (n=6, 19.3%) and anomalies incompatible with life (n=2, 6.5%). Conclusion: Primary sepsis and sepsis due to technical problems were the main causes of mortality in our series. Factors predicting mortality were pneumonia at presentation, sepsis at presentation or that acquired during hospitalization, major or life threatening anomalies, long gaps and major leaks. The Waterston classification was statistically the best applicable in this study. Key-words: Esophageal atresia, Tracheosopheal fistula, Mortality, Risk factors - congenital anomalies, Sepsis. RésuméIntroduction: Des rapports diverses récents avaient indiqués que les anormalies liées représentent la cause principale de la mortalite postopératoire chez des enfants nés atteints d'atresie oesophage (AO) et / ou fistule tracheoesophage (FTO) Nos observations donnent des causes supplementaires de la mortalité en plus des causes citées ci-dessus. L'objet de cette étude est d'identifier les causes principales de la mortalite postopératoire dans les cas de AO et / ou FTO dans notre programme. On va également utiliser cette classification préopératoire qui prédit le taux de la mortalité de faire la comparaison nécessaire. Patients et methods: Nous avons fait le bilan de 101 graphiques de tous les cas atteints de AO et / ou FTO d'une durée de 11 ans de 1990 au 2000. Mobidité et causes de la mortalité postopératoire pendant la première admission ont été identifiés. Des facteurs qui prédéterminent la mortalité ont été documentés. Les patients ont été groupés selon les classification de Waterton, Montreal et Spitz. Résultat: Trente et un patients soit 30,7% étaient morts. On avait identifié deux groupes majeurs de la mortalité post opératoire. Le premier groupe comprend les causes possible de la mortalité évitable qui étaient le sepsis premaire (n = 10, 32, 3%), problème techniques (n = 8,25,8%) et pneumonie grave (n = 5, 16, 1%). Les causes inèvitables de la mortalité comprend des anormalies congénitales principales, (n = 6, 19,3%) et anormalies incompatibles avec la vie (n = 2,6,5%). Conclusion: Sepsis primaire et sepsis provoqué par des problèmes techniques étaient les causes principales de la mortalité dans nos séries. Des facteurs qui prédéterminent la mortalité était la pneumonie et présentation, septicité au cours de la présentation ou bien septicite acquise pendant l'hôpitalization, majeur ou bien des anormalies qui menacent la vie, un écart long et des fuites principales statisquement, la classification de Waterston était la meilleur utilisée dans cette étude. West African Journal of Medicine Vol. 24(1) 2005: 311-315

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.632

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWest African Journal of MedicineSame topicEsophageal and GI PathologyFrench-language works237,207