Elevated auditory brainstem response thresholds in mice with Connexin36 gene ablation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CONCLUSION: Expression of connexin36 (Cx36) and electrical synapses formed by Cx36-containing gap junctions contribute to normal auditory brainstem response thresholds in mice. OBJECTIVES: Electrical synaptic transmission mediated by gap junctions has not been intensively studied in the auditory system. This study used transgenic mice with knockout of the gene coding for the major protein that forms neuronal gap junctions in mammalian brain (Cx36) to evaluate the role of Cx36 in murine hearing. METHODS: Auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were measured in 26 wild-type and 26 Cx36 knockout mice. ABR thresholds were used to assess auditory brainstem function at four frequencies. DPOAEs were delivered for seven frequency pairs to assess cochlear function. RESULTS: The magnitudes of the 2f1-f2 distortion products were not different between Cx36 knockout and wild-type mice, suggesting similar cochlear function in the two groups. ABR thresholds were significantly elevated in the Cx36 knockout compared with the wild-type groups, suggesting impaired function in the auditory brainstem. The results suggest that electrical synapses formed by Cx36-containing gap junctions contribute to auditory sound processing and function at the level of the brainstem, not the cochlea. These findings may be important for understanding human auditory pathology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".