MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

High-Precision, Kinematic Positioning with a Single GPS Receiver

2002· article· en· W2061485412 on OpenAlexaff
Sunil Bisnath, Richard B. Langley

Bibliographic record

VenueNAVIGATION Journal of the Institute of Navigation · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGNSS positioning and interference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPseudorangeGlobal Positioning SystemPrecise Point PositioningComputer sciencePrecision Lightweight GPS ReceiverOffset (computer science)Real-time computingReal Time KinematicSoftwareReceiver autonomous integrity monitoringRangingGPS disciplined oscillatorTime to first fixEphemerisGNSS applicationsGps receiverAssisted GPSEngineeringTelecommunicationsSatellite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: The goal of the research described in this paper is the design of a GPS data processing technique capable of producing high-precision positioning results, regardless of platform dynamics, utilizing only a single, high-quality receiver. This goal is accomplished by combining two processing philosophies: point positioning, which makes use of precise GPS constellation ephemeris and clock offset information to estimate a single receiver's state; and carrier-phase–filtered pseudorange processing, in which pseudorange-based positioning is supplemented with carrier-based position-change information. Results derived with the developed software indicate that near-decimeter-level positioning accuracy is attainable for a variety of platforms, ranging from static, terrestrial reference stations, to aircraft, to satellites. A number of modeling improvements can be applied to the existing software, and testing in the real-time environment is planned.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNAVIGATION Journal of the Institute of NavigationSame topicGNSS positioning and interferenceFrench-language works237,207