MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2061532350 · doi:10.1167/14.10.285

Effect of continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) of human brain areas MT+ and V1 on color and motion perception.

2014· article· en· W2061532350 on OpenAlexaff
Shaleeza Kaderali, Yeon Jin Kim, Alexandre Reynaud, Kathy T. Mullen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vision · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicVisual perception and processing mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCTBSChromatic scaleLuminanceStimulus (psychology)StimulationColor visionPsychologyAudiologyNeuroscienceMedicineArtificial intelligenceOpticsComputer sciencePhysicsCognitive psychologyTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Previous studies on chromatic and luminance defined global motion have established a dissociation between visual thresholds for direction discrimination and stimulus detection (Michna & Mullen, JOV 8(5):10, 2008). Here we use cTBS (a repetitive TMS protocol) to investigate the differential effects of stimulation on these thresholds in areas hMT+ and V1. We use both luminance and isoluminant chromatic global motion stimuli. Methods: Brain areas hMT+ and V1 were localized using the reported induction of moving or stationary phosphenes, respectively. The vertex was stimulated as a control. Eight participants performed a motion discrimination task in which the direction of Gaussian dots in a random dot kinematogram was identified, and a detection task, in which the dots was detected regardless of motion, for isoluminant chromatic and luminance stimuli. Thresholds were measured before cTBS and after stimulation for one hour. Results: For the motion discrimination task, cTBS stimulation of area hMT+ selectively impaired visual performance for both luminance and isoluminant chromatic stimuli in comparison to area V1 and vertex. Maximal effects occurred 3-18 minutes after stimulation, and by one hour performance had returned to baseline. For the detection task, no selective effect of cTBS was observed. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that the use of cTBS impairs the function of area hMT+, providing further evidence that hMT+ is involved in the analysis of luminance defined global motion. Also, even though isoluminant color vision is poor for motion perception, we show that area hMT+ is contributing to residual chromatic motion at isoluminance. The results indicate a causal link between neural activity in area hMT+ and the perception of chromatic motion. This effect may be mediated by the response of M-cells to the chromatic stimuli, which feed into the motion pathway. Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2014

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vision→Same topicVisual perception and processing mechanisms→French-language works237,207→