MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061533689 · doi:10.1016/j.crci.2007.03.013

Carboxymethyl glucosides and carboxymethyl glucoside lactones: A detailed study of their preparation by oxidative degradation of disaccharides

2007· article· en· W2061533689 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ronan Pierre, Stéphane Chambert, Fahima Ali‐Rachedi, Mathieu Danel, Stéphane Trombotto, Alain Doutheau, Yves Queneau

Bibliographic record

VenueComptes Rendus Chimie · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnzyme Production and Characterization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueComputer Modelling Group
KeywordsChemistrySynthonAcylationHydrogen peroxideLactoneHydrolysisGlucosideSubstrate (aquarium)CatalysisOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A detailed study of the access to carboxylmethyl tri- O -acetyl-α- d -glucopyranoside 2- O -lactone from isomaltulose was performed. Side products can arise from incomplete oxidation of isomaltulose by hydrogen peroxide, acidic hydrolysis, or opening of the lactone during the acylation step. Based on these observations, the optimum conditions for the preparation of this interesting synthon, as well as of its benzylated and pivaloylated analogues, was determined. Also, the use of the hydrogenated analogue of isomaltulose, isomalt ® , as the starting material was studied. In this case, during the oxidation step, the catalysis by sodium tungstate proved to be indispensable to form carboxymethyl glucoside, unlike for isomaltulose. Although giving low yields, this reaction is very direct and was performed using cheap and simple procedures from a readily available substrate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComptes Rendus ChimieSame topicEnzyme Production and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207