In vivo 4.0‐T magnetic resonance investigation of spinal cord inflammation, demyelination, and axonal damage in chronic‐progressive experimental allergic encephalomyelitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To image and dissect the lumbar spinal cord of guinea pigs with chronic-progressive experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (CP-EAE) and directly correlate the pathology to the magnetic resonance (MR) image data obtained at 4 T and determine if these MR contrasts can accurately differentiate a specific type of pathology from control tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The amount of inflammation, demyelination, and axonal pathology were quantified in the whole cord cross sections. The signal intensities (SIs) for 228 individual regions of interest (ROIs) (normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) and tissue containing inflammation with or without demyelination) were measured directly from the corresponding area on the MR images. RESULTS: Conventional MR contrast SIs and magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) were related to the degree of demyelination and presence of inflammation. MTR and proton density-weighted (PDw) SIs were both moderately related to axonal density. The SIs for NAWM and in lesions containing both cellular infiltrates and demyelination in all conventional MR contrast images were also increased, whereas the MTR was decreased when compared to control tissue. CONCLUSION: The SIs from the conventional MR contrasts and MTR at 4 T were sensitive to the presence of disease within CP-EAE spinal cord, but were not specific to the underlying pathology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".