Basin and Channel Contributions to a Model Antarctic Circumpolar Current
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The idea that basinlike dynamics may play a major role in determining the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC) transport is revisited. A simple analytic model is developed to describe the relationship between the wind stress and transport. At very low-wind stress, a nonzero minimum is predicted. This is followed by two distinct dynamical regimes for stronger forcing: 1) a Stommel regime in which transport increases linearly with forcing strength; and 2) a saturation regime in which the transport levels off. The baroclinic structure of the Sverdrup flux into the Drake Passage latitude band is central to the analytic model, and the geometry of characteristics, or geostrophic contours, is key to predicting the transition between the two regimes. A robustness analysis is performed using an eddy-permitting quasigeostrophic model in idealized geometries. Many simulations were carried out in large domains across a range of forcing strengths. The simulations agree qualitatively with the analytic model, with two main discrepancies being related to zonal jet structures and to a western boundary inertial recirculation. Eddy fluxes associated with zonal jets modify the baroclinic structure and lower the saturation transport value. Inertial effects increase the transport, although this effect is mainly limited to smaller domains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".