Modified constraint-induced therapy for children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: A feasibility study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the feasibility of family-focused, modified constraint-induced therapy with children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy and test study procedures in preparation for a randomized controlled trial.Design: Prospective pre–post feasibility study.Methods and procedures: Ten children (median age: 3 years 6 months) were assessed at baseline, at completion of intervention and at 6 months post-baseline. Intervention consisted of a mitt worn on the unaffected hand for 2 hours per day for 8 weeks. Targeted adjunct therapy was provided during the time the mitt was worn. Primary assessments included the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, Goal Attainment Scaling, Assisting Hand Assessment and the Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function.Outcomes: Modified constraint-induced therapy as implemented in this study was acceptable to participants. Over the intervention period, participants experienced improvements in the performance of important daily activities as determined by the primary outcome measures.Conclusions: Modified constraint-induced therapy which targets participant-identified goals and which is family-focused warrants further investigation utilizing randomized trial methodology.Propósito: Determinar la viabilidad de la terapia modificada de inducción de restricción enfocada en la familia en niños con parálisis cerebral hemipléjica, y evaluar procedimientos de estudio en la preparación de una prueba controlada aleatorizada. Diseño: Estudio prospectivo pre-post viabilidad. Métodos y procedimientos: Se evaluaron a diez niños (edades medias: 3años 6 meses) en una etapa inicial, al completar el tratamiento y a los seis meses después de la evaluación inicial. La intervención consistió del uso de un guante en la mano no afectada durante 2 horas al día por 8 semanas. La terapia adjunta fue proporcionada durante el periodo de tiempo en que el guante fue usado. Los instrumentos de evaluación primaria incluyeron: Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, Goal Attainment Scaling, Assisting Hand Assessment y the Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function. Resultados: La terapia de inducción de restricción modificada fue aceptada por los participantes de la forma en que fue implementada en este estudio. Los participantes experimentaron mejoría en el desempaño de las actividades de la vida diaria durante el periodo de tratamiento, siendo determinado esto por los resultados de las mediciones primarias. Conclusiones: El hecho de que las terapias de inducción de restricción modificada tengan como objetivo metas identificadas por los pacientes y un enfoque familiar, sienta precedente para la realización de investigaciones futuras que utilicen una metodología de pruebas aleatorizadas. Palabras clave: Terapia de inducción restringida modificada, parálisis cerebral, función del miembro superior, pediátrica, enfocado en la familia, hemiplejia
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".