The Effects of Intravenous Sildenafil on Hemodynamics and Cardiac Sympathetic Activity in Chronic Human Heart Failure
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Erectile dysfunction is common in patients with chronic heart failure and sildenafil is an effective treatment option in this population. Sildenafil has been reported to increase sympathetic outflow in normal volunteers. To date, experience with sildenafil in patients with congestive heart failure is limited and the impact of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibition on sympathetic activity in this population has not been evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: 10 patients with heart failure (ejection fraction 23+/-3%) were studied. Generalized and cardiac sympathetic activity responses to an intravenous infusion of sildenafil were measured by the norepinephrine spillover method. In response to sildenafil, there was a significant reduction in mean pulmonary artery (-26+/-5%, P<0.01) and mean arterial pressures (-8+/-1%, P<0.01). These hemodynamic responses were accompanied by a 22+/-5% reduction in cardiac norepinephrine spillover (P<0.02) but no change in total body norepinephrine spillover. CONCLUSIONS: The acute administration of sildenafil is associated with a modest reduction in systemic arterial blood pressure and a more substantial reduction in pulmonary arterial pressure. These hemodynamic changes are observed in the absence of systemic sympathetic activation and are associated with a reduction in cardiac norepinephrine spillover in patients with chronic heart failure. These observations are relevant given the high prevalence of erectile dysfunction in this patient population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it