MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2061752357 · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht311.5907

Effects of the p-selectin antagonist inclacumab on myocardial damage according to the time interval between infusion and percutaneous coronary intervention

2013· article· en· W2061752357 on OpenAlexaff
Valérie Duchatelle, Philippe L. L’Allier, J.-F. Tanguay, Thibaut Petroni, Sheri L. Robb, D. C. Johnson, Daniel Cournoyer, Marie Claude Guertin, Sheri Wright, Jean‐Claude Tardif

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePercutaneous coronary interventionCardiologyInternal medicineAntagonistConventional PCIInterval (graph theory)AnesthesiaMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: P-selectin antagonism could provide anti-inflammatory, anti-thrombotic and anti-atherogenic effects. Inclacumab is a human recombinant monoclonal antibody directed against P-selectin. The SELECT-ACS trial was a multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 study of inclacumab. The placebo-adjusted change in troponin I (TnI) with inclacumab 20 mg/kg was -24.4% at 24 hrs (p=0.05) and -22.4% at 16 hrs (p=0.066) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Inclacumab 20 mg/kg also reduced peak TnI by 23.8% (p=0.054) and the area under the curve over 24 hrs by 33.9% (p=0.075). We aimed at determining the effects of inclacumab on myocardial damage after coronary intervention according to varying time intervals between study drug infusion and PCI. Methods: SELECT-ACS was a double-blind trial of 530 patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) scheduled for coronary angiography and ad hoc PCI. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one infusion of placebo, inclacumab 5 mg/kg or 20 mg/kg between 60 minutes and 24 hours before the procedure. Troponin I (TnI) and CK-MB levels were measured at baseline, and 8, 16 and 24 hours after PCI. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in TnI to 16 and 24 hrs. There was no effect of inclacumab 5 mg/kg vs placebo. Results: The median duration between study drug infusion and PCI was 202 minutes, with no significant difference among study groups. In patients with a time interval between infusion and PCI less than the median, the placebo-adjusted geometric mean percent changes in TnI at 16 hrs and 24 hrs post-PCI in the inclacumab 20 mg/kg group were -32.5% [(-54.2, -0.6), p=0.046] and -44.6% [(-63.8, -15.4), p=0.006], whereas the changes for CK-MB were -24.4% [(-43.8, 1.7), p=0.065] and -31.0% [(-48.5, -7.5), p=0.013]. The placebo-adjusted changes in TnI and CK-MB at 24 hrs in patients with a time interval above the median were -17.7% [(-46.1, 25.9), p=0.368] and -12.6% [(-34.7, 16.9), p=0.362]. When dividing patients according to intervals of < 180 minutes, 180 to 240 minutes, and > 240 minutes, the placebo-adjusted geometric mean percent changes in TnI at 24 hrs post-PCI with inclacumab 20 mg/kg were -43.5% [(-64.9, -9.0), p=0.019], -39.4% [(-67.5, 13.1), p=0.115] and -11.3% [(-46.3, 46.4), p=0.637]; similar findings were observed for CK-MB (-27.3% [(-47.7, 0.9)], p=0.057; -29.5% [(-53.9, 7.9)], p=0.11; -11.1% [(-37.1, 25.6)], p=0.505). Conclusion: Inclacumab reduces post-PCI myocardial damage in patients with NSTEMI, and benefits appear to be the largest when the infusion occurs between 60 and 180 minutes before PCI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal→Same topicCell Adhesion Molecules Research→French-language works237,207→