MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061820008 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.130324

Retroperitoneal Fibrosis During Etanercept Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis

2013· letter· en· W2061820008 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marion Couderc, Sylvain Mathieu, Jean‐Jacques Dubost, Martin Soubrier

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2013
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIgG4-Related and Inflammatory Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEtanerceptAzathioprineInternal medicineErythrocyte sedimentation rateRheumatoid arthritisRheumatologyInfliximabGastroenterologyPerindoprilSurgeryTumor necrosis factor alphaDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) is a rare disease characterized by fibroinflammatory tissue surrounding the abdominal aorta and frequently encasing the ureter 1 . Empirical therapy includes high doses of corticosteroids as first-line treatment, and in some refractory cases immunosuppressive agents such as azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, or tamoxifen 1 . However, some patients fail to respond to immunosuppressive treatment. New drugs are needed for this patient subset. Catanoso, et al reported the case of a woman with idiopathic RPF whose condition improved after receiving infliximab, a monoclonal antibody directed against tumor necrosis factor- (TNF-) 2 . In contrast, we describe the cases of 2 patients who developed RPF while receiving etanercept, a soluble receptor, another TNF- blocker for RA. In the Rheumatology Department of Clermont-Ferrand Teaching Hospital, 2 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) developed RPF while receiving TNF- blockers for RA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.347
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of RheumatologySame topicIgG4-Related and Inflammatory DiseasesFrench-language works237,207