MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061826790 · doi:10.1118/1.1514579

Technical note: Sinogram merging to compensate for truncation of projection data in tomotherapy imaging

2002· article· en· W2061826790 on OpenAlexaff
H. R. Hooper, B. G. Fallone

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTomotherapyMultileaf collimatorCollimatorProjection (relational algebra)Computer scienceIterative reconstructionMedical imagingComputer visionOpticsOffset (computer science)Collimated lightImage-guided radiation therapyPhysicsArtificial intelligenceBeam (structure)Nuclear medicineLinear particle acceleratorRadiation therapyAlgorithmRadiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An advantage of helical tomotherapy radiation therapy systems is that on-line megavoltage computed tomography (CT) images can be reconstructed to verify patient positioning. One limitation of such systems is that the field-of-view (FOV) of the photon fan-beam is limited by the aperture size of the binary multileaf collimator (MLC) used to modulate treatment beams. For patients larger than the FOV the acquired sinograms will be truncated causing artifacts in the resultant megavoltage CT images. Computer simulations are used to demonstrate that such artifacts can be eliminated or at least reduced by merging appropriately acquired truncated fan-beam sinograms to form a nontruncated parallel-beam sinogram. The necessary fan-beam sinograms are acquired with the patient translated to different offset locations within the gantry. The parallel-beam sinogram is then used to reconstruct the final CT image. The increase in patient dose due to the acquisition of more than one fan-beam sinogram can be reduced by using properly designed binary MLC fields to block redundant projection rays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Radiotherapy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207