An oxocarbenium-ion intermediate of a ribozyme reaction indicated by kinetic isotope effects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many of the enzymes that catalyze reactions at nucleotide glycosidic linkages proceed through either a reactive oxocarbenium-ion intermediate or a transition state with considerable oxocarbenium character. To investigate how an RNA active site deals with the catalytic challenge of nucleotide synthesis, we probed the transition state of a ribozyme able to promote the formation of a pyrimidine nucleotide. Primary and secondary kinetic isotope effects indicate that this ribozyme stabilizes a highly dissociative reaction with considerable sp2 hybridization and negligible bond order between the departing pyrophosphate leaving group and the anomeric carbon. The small primary 13C isotope effect of 1.002 +/- 0.003 indicates that the reaction is likely to be less concerted than that observed for protein nucleotide synthesis enzymes, which typically have primary 13C isotope effects of 1.02-1.03. The dissociative nature of the ribozyme reaction most resembles the reaction of some hydrolytic enzymes, such as uracil DNA glycosylase, which uses the negative charges found in the phosphodiester backbone of its DNA substrate to transiently stabilize an oxocarbenium ion during hydrolysis. The detectable hydrolysis observed in the ribozyme reaction indicates that shielding of this reactive intermediate from water is a significant challenge for RNA, which protein enzymes that synthesize nucleotides have managed to overcome during evolution, apparently by the utilization of more concerted chemistry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".