MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061873383 · doi:10.1086/503709

Deep <i>u</i> *‐ and <i>g</i> ‐Band Imaging of the <i>Spitzer Space Telescope</i> First Look Survey Field: Observations and Source Catalogs

2006· article· en· W2061873383 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hyunjin Shim, Myungshin Im, Soojong Pak, Philip Choi, D. Fadda, G. Hélou, Lisa J. Storrie‐Lombardi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsGalaxyTelescopeSpitzer Space TelescopeAperture (computer memory)Magnitude (astronomy)Point sourceAstronomyField of viewField (mathematics)Optics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present deep u *- and g -band images taken with the MegaCam on the 3.6 m Canada-France-Hawai'i Telescope to support the extragalactic component of the Spitzer First Look Survey (FLS). In this paper we outline the observations, present source catalogs, and characterize the completeness, reliability, astrometric accuracy, and number counts of this data set. In the central 1 deg 2 region of the FLS, we reach depths of g ~ 26.5 mag and u * ~ 26.2 mag (AB magnitude, 5 σ detection over a 3'' aperture) with ~4 hr of exposure time for each filter. For the entire FLS region (~5 deg 2 coverage), we obtained u *-band images to the shallower depth of u * = 25.0-25.4 mag (5 σ, 3'' aperture). The average seeing of the observations is 0 85 for the central field and ~1 00 for the other fields. Astrometric calibration of the fields yields an absolute astrometric accuracy of 0 15 when matched with the SDSS point sources between 18 < g < 22. Source catalogs have been created using SExtractor. The catalogs are 50% complete and >99.3% reliable down to g ≃ 26.5 mag and u * ≃ 26.2 mag for the central 1 deg 2 field. In the shallower u *-band images, the catalogs are 50% complete and 98.2% reliable down to 24.8-25.4 mag. These images and source catalogs will serve as a useful resource for studying the galaxy evolution using the FLS data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement SeriesSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207