MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061887339 · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.162.1.9906108

Hospitalization among Workers Compensated for Occupational Asthma

2000· article· en· W2061887339 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gary M. Liss, Susan M. Tarlo, YOKA MacFARLANE, Ka Sing Yeung

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOccupational exposure and asthma
Canadian institutionsWorkplace Safety & Insurance BoardUniversity of TorontoOntario Ministry of LabourMinistry of Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsthmaRelative riskPopulationConfidence intervalOccupational asthmaRespiratory diseasePediatricsInternal medicinePhysical therapyEnvironmental healthLung

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Occupational asthma (OA) can cause persistent symptoms, but populations with OA have not been followed for the development of serious outcomes such as hospitalization. Subjects receiving compensation for OA during 1980-1993, and a comparison sample of workers with musculoskeletal injuries (INJ) were identified from the Ontario Workers' Compensation Board. We also identified for comparison a group of asthmatic patients (AP) seen at a tertiary care hospital clinic during the same period. The file was matched with the Ontario Ministry of Health data base of hospitalizations through 1996. We compared the frequency of hospitalization of the subgroups with that expected in the general population using standardized morbidity ratios (SMRs), and directly by proportional hazards regression. The study group included 844 OA claimants, 1,556 INJ claimants, and 402 AP. Although admissions for all causes combined and respiratory disease among INJ were less than expected in the general population, admissions for all causes combined exceeded that expected among OA and AP. Admissions for respiratory disease were markedly greater than expected among OA (SMR 9.2) and AP (SMR 17) because of even greater excess admissions for asthma (SMRs 45 and 81, respectively). Compared with those with INJ, those with OA were more likely to be hospitalized for all causes combined (adjusted relative risk [RR] 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2 to 16); cardiovascular disease (RR 1.4, 95% CI 0.9 to 2.0); respiratory disease (RR 5.4, 95% CI 3.8 to 7.7); and asthma (RR 28.1, 95% CI 10.2 to 77.2) but not for malignancies (RR 1.0) or injuries (RR 0.9). Those with OA were admitted to hospital about half as frequently as AP for respiratory disease and asthma (although this was modified by smoking status and sex), but were 30% more likely to be admitted for ischemic heart disease (IHD). Among the OA claimants, factors that were significantly associated with hospitalization for asthma included older age and exposure to agents other than isocyanates. Those with OA became less likely to be hospitalized for asthma with increasing time after onset, particularly after 5 or more years. We conclude that subjects with OA suffer higher rates of hospitalizations for all causes combined, respiratory disease, and asthma than other workers, although less than among AP seen at a tertiary care center.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.167

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineSame topicOccupational exposure and asthmaFrench-language works237,207