MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061926360 · doi:10.5539/ijb.v3n3p119

Use of a 15N-tracer Method as a Tool to Indicate the Assimilation of Elicitin-Sterol Complexes by Phytophthorasojae

2011· article· en· W2061926360 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lina F. Yousef, Warren A. Dick, Richard P. Dick

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Biology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogens and Resistance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStigmasterolSterolPhytosterolPhytophthora sojaeAssimilation (phonology)BiologyBiochemistryChemistryBotanyCholesterolGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mechanism of sterol acquisition and transport in oomycetes of the genus Phytophthora is suspected to involve secreted class-I elicitins, but little information is available to confirm this. The objective of this study was to determine if class-I elicitins of Phytophthorasojaepromote assimilation into this organism when a phytosterol is amended into its growth medium using a qualitative 15N tracer method. Two P. sojae growth experiments were conducted involving 15N labeled mycelium or 15N spent broth containing putative P. sojaeelicitins in the absence or presence of a phytosterol (stigmasterol). Mycelium was harvested after 0, 2, 3 or 6 days of growth and analyzed for d15N by Elemental Analysis-Isotopic Ratio Mass Spectrometry (EA-IRMS). Results from the two experiments demonstrated that P. sojae assimilated putative elicitins from the spent broth more rapidly when stigmasterol was present in the growth medium. These results provide evidence for the involvement of secreted class-I elicitins in sterol acquisition by P. sojae.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score0.216

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of BiologySame topicPlant Pathogens and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207