MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061938507 · doi:10.1080/02755947.2014.920738

Assessment of Fat Reserves Adequacy in the First Migrant Silver American Eels of a Large-Scale Stocking Experiment

2014· article· en· W2061938507 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Catherine M. Couillard, Guy Verreault, Pierre Dumont, D. R. Stanley, R. W. Threader

Bibliographic record

VenueNorth American Journal of Fisheries Management · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
Canadian institutionsOntario Power GenerationNiagara CollegeMinistère des Ressources naturelles et des ForêtsFisheries and Oceans Canada
FundersOntario Power Generation
KeywordsStockingAnguilla rostrataFisheryEstuaryReproductionBiologyEnvironmental scienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An experimental stocking program in the St. Lawrence River–Lake Ontario system provided a unique opportunity to compare reproductive fitness of migrant silver American Eels Anguilla rostrata from the stocking program (SM) and wild migrants (WM), both of which were grown in the same location. Body size, muscle lipid stores, oocyte development, and morphometric indices of silvering were compared between SM and WM eels captured in the St. Lawrence River estuary. Migrant eels from the stocking program were smaller than wild migrants from the estuary, but their size was similar to migrating wild silver American Eels from their site of original capture on the Atlantic coast of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. A bioenergetic model was used to estimate the costs of migration and reproduction and the duration of migration. The adequacy of the measured lipid reserves to meet these estimated energetic costs was assessed for SM and WM eels. Gonad maturation and stage of silvering for SM eels were less advanced than that for WM eels, and they had lower initial muscle fat reserves and higher estimated energetic requirements for migration as a consequence of their smaller size. It was estimated that 100% of the SM eels would not have adequate fat reserves for migration and reproduction, whereas 57% of the WM eels would have adequate reserves. Smaller-sized SM eels would take 1.6 times longer to reach the spawning grounds than WM eels and, thus, may not arrive in synchrony with these wild migrants. Thus, smaller-sized, out-migrating, stocked eels from the upper St. Lawrence River are less likely than wild migrants to complete successfully their migration and reproduction. These results support the recommendation to source and stock American Eels at sites where they have similar life strategies to increase the likelihood of successful silver eel escapement. Received November 27, 2013; accepted April 9, 2014

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNorth American Journal of Fisheries ManagementSame topicReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic speciesFrench-language works237,207