Supreme Court of Canada to Hear Pharmacy Challenges to Ontario Ban on Private-Label Generics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The legal fight between the Ontario government and 2 pharmacy chains over generic drug regulations is heading to Canada's highest court. In a ruling on August 30, 2012, the Supreme Court of Canada revealed its decision to hear 2 appeals on the issue — one from Shoppers Drug Mart and the other from the owners of the Rexall chain, the Katz Group of Companies. The battle between the 2 companies and the Ontario government dates back to 2010, when the province implemented new generic drug regulations, that among other measures, banned pharmacies from selling their own private-label generic drugs. The province maintained private-label generics would reduce competitiveness and drive up prices. Shoppers and the Katz Group launched a legal challenge before the Ontario Divisional Court and they won the first round. In February 2011, the court ruled that the province went too far with the ban on store-brand generics. That ruling was overturned by the Ontario Court of Appeal, which ruled in favour of the provincial government in December 2011 — restoring the prohibition on private-label generic drug products. The Supreme Court of Canada is expected to hear the appeals in May 2013.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.041 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.028 | 0.021 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".