Aspect-dependent high-irradiance damage in two transplanted foliose forest lichens,<i>Lobaria pulmonaria</i>and<i>Parmelia sulcata</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-irradiance damage in two epiphytic lichens was recorded as reduction in predawn photosystem II quantum yield (Fv/Fm) measured at the end of a night with full hydration. Measurements were repeated during a 29-day transplantation in early summer at defined aspects (north, east, south, west, perpendicular to the sun at noon, and shade) in an open site at 60°N. These treatments included the contrasts that remaining lichens adjacent to clear-cut areas could experience subsequent to logging. The Fv/Fmvalues declined linearly with the mean irradiance during the previous day, with the old-forest epiphyte Lobaria pulmonaria (L.) Hoffm. being consistently more severely photoinhibited than the ubiquitous Parmelia sulcata Taylor. Both irradiance levels and predawn Fv/Fmvalues decreased in the following direction: shaded controls > transplants facing north > south, east, west > transplants perpendicular to the sun. Since the transplantation period happened to be very rainy with favorable conditions for recovery, all transplants survived. Nevertheless, photoinhibition was sustained from one day to the other, especially in the old-forest species L. pulmonaria, implying a long-lasting strain, which could affect long-term performance and survival of thalli. The results are discussed in a wider context including confounding effects of irradiance in forests, with implications to facilitate lichen conservation in managed forests.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".