MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062038475 · doi:10.1071/wf12197

Experimental confirmation of the MWIR and LWIR grey body assumption for vegetation fire flame emissivity

2014· article· en· W2062038475 on OpenAlexaff
Joshua M. Johnston, Martin J. Wooster, T. J. Lynham

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Wildland Fire · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsCanadian Forest Service
FundersNatural Environment Research CouncilSight Research UK
KeywordsEmissivityAtmospheric sciencesVegetation (pathology)Environmental scienceTaigaInfraredExtinction (optical mineralogy)MeteorologyRemote sensingChemistryOpticsGeologyMineralogyPhysicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The temperature and emissivity of forest fire flames play a key role in understanding fire behaviour, modelling fire spread and calculating fire parameters by means of active fire thermal remote sensing. Essential to many of these is the often-made assumption that vegetation fire flames behave as grey bodies in the infrared (IR). Although the emissivity of flames and its relationship to flame depth has been measured experimentally using thermal imagers working in the long-wave IR (LWIR, 8–12 µm), no published study has yet demonstrated relationships in the important mid-wave IR (MWIR, 3–5 µm) spectral region, nor conclusively demonstrated that assumptions about grey body behaviour across these two important IR atmospheric windows fit well with reality. Our study explores these issues using measurements of boreal forest fuels burned with flame depths ranging from 0.2 to 4.2 m. Observations of two stable black body sources made through the differing flame depths were used to explore flame spectral emissivities and their relationship to flame depth. We found essentially the same relationship between flame emissivity and flame depth for both spectral regions, (extinction coefficient K = 0.7 m–1), confirming that the grey body assumption for forest fire flames in the MWIR and LWIR atmospheric windows appears valid for the fire conditions encountered here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Wildland FireSame topicFire effects on ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207