Abstract LB-65: A gene expression predictor of pathological node stage of urothelial bladder cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The use of systemic neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy prior to radical cystectomy for clinically muscle invasive but clinically node negative urothelial carcinoma (UC) has been shown in a recent meta-analysis of randomized trials to confer a 5-7% survival benefit (1). This relatively modest effect, therapy toxicity, and treatment delay in non-responsive patients has diminished enthusiasm and use of this approach. In contrast, defining patients that would benefit most would provide a compelling reason for use of such therapy. Despite negative clinical staging, up to 30% of patients have lymph node metastasis at cystectomy, the most important predictor for subsequent disease relapse. Here we develop a gene expression-based predictor of node positive disease at cystectomy in clinically node negative patients that could be applied before definitive resection using tissue from the patient's endoscopic diagnosis. Importantly, we develop a predictor that can be applied on formalin fixed paraffin embedding (FFPE) tumor samples, for facile deployment of this clinical tool. We first performed an analysis of correlation of gene expression between fresh frozen (FF) and FFPE across 32 paired tissues samples preserved both ways, using bootstrapping to select only array probes that maintain robust correlation irrespective of tissue preservation method. Using the “robust” gene set, we identified a subset of genes that were differentially expressed between node positive and node negative disease found at cystectomy in a cohort of 90 FFPE tumor specimens we profiled by oligonucleotide microarrays. A model based on these genes was then optimized for prediction of node positive disease on an independent set of 91 FF specimens profiled on the same microarray platform (2), using a weighted kNN algorithm. A final, 108-feature (probeset) predictor was then tested on a third cohort of 185 FFPE samples from a prospective randomized clinical trial (AUO-AB 05/95) (3). On the independent dataset, the predictor exhibited favorable discriminant characteristics (AUC=0.70, 95%CI 0.62 to 0.78, P<0.0001, ROC Analysis) for prediction of node metastasis at cystectomy in clinically node negative patients. Based on the performance on this prospectively collected dataset, we have developed a dual cutoff system, as has been used for other molecular classifiers (4), providing a threshold yielding a 50% PPV for a priori identification of high risk therapy candidates and a threshold yielding an 85% NPV for identification of low risk candidates to exclude from treatment. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated this predictor's performance was independently associated with nodal status when adjusting for clinicopathologic factors (P<0.001). We suggest that this strategy may aid in the decision of whether to use neoadjuvant chemotherapy and may help to close the gap between evidence in practice in this regard. References 1. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2005 2. Sanchez-Carbayo. JCO 2005. 3. Lehmann. JCO 2005. 4. Paik. NEJM 2004. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-65.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".