Transparent, stretchable, carbon-nanotube-inlaid conductors enabled by standard replication technology for capacitive pressure, strain and touch sensors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes a standard replication approach for preparing transparent elastomeric conductors with single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) inlaid just below the surface. The elastic conductors were fabricated by spray coating a SWCNT suspension in chloroform on a fluorinated substrate, followed by the standard replication, casting liquid elastomers like polydimethylsiloxane on the SWCNT film, curing and peeling off the substrate. The replication strategy can produce elastic conductors with a flat or a desirable patterned surface. The resultant elastic conductors had excellent stability under repeated mechanical loading and stretchability up to 300%. It retained conductance even after 10 tape tests. Using the SWCNT-inlaid stretchable conductors as electrodes, elastic capacitors were fabricated using a mask-assisted method. The results showed that these capacitors are good candidates for multi-functional capacitive pressure, strain, and touch sensors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".