The Influence of Protein Structure on the Products Emerging from Succinimide Hydrolysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Proteins are vulnerable to spontaneous, covalent modifications that may result in alterations to structure and function. Asparagines are particularly labile, able to undergo deamidation through the formation of a succinimide intermediate to produce either aspartate or isoaspartate residues. Although aspartates cannot undergo deamidation they can form a succinimide and result in the same products. Isoaspartyls are the principal product of succinimide hydrolysis, accounting for 65-85% of the emerging residues. The variability in the ratio of products emerging from succinimide hydrolysis suggests the ability of protein structure to influence succinimide outcome. In the H15D histidine-containing protein (HPr), phosphorylation of the active site aspartate catalyzes the formation of a cyclic intermediate. Resolution of this species is exclusively to aspartate residues, suggestive of either a succinimide with restrained hydrolysis, or an isoimide, from which aspartyl residues are the only possible product. Deletion of the C-terminal residue of this protein does not influence the ability for phosphorylation or ring formation, but it does allow for isoaspartyl formation, verifying a succinimide as the cyclic intermediate in H15D HPr. Isoaspartyl formation in H15D Delta85 is rationalized to occur as a consequence of elimination of steric restrictions imposed by the C terminus on the main-chain carbonyl of the succinimide, the required point of nucleophilic attack of a water molecule for isoaspartyl formation. This is the first reported demonstration of the influence of protein structure on the products emerging from succinimide hydrolysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it