A survey of factor prophylaxis in the Canadian haemophilia A population
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-dose factor prophylaxis, defined as the infusion of 25-40 factor (F) VIII International Units (IU) kg bodyweight (bw)(-1)> or = x 3 per week, started at age 1-2 years of life in boys with severe haemophilia A prevents the development of significant bleed-related arthropathy. However, programmes of prophylaxis are very expensive and venous access is a challenge. To ascertain patterns of prophylaxis in Canada during the period of a global shortage of recombinant FVIII concentrate a survey was conducted in 2001. The response rate was 83% and the survey identified 247 inhibitor-negative haemophilia A cases receiving prophylaxis, defined as the regular administration of FVIII at least once weekly, from 14 Canadian haemophilia treatment centres. The median age of the group identified was 13 years (range: 1-65) and 95% of cases had severe haemophilia A defined by a circulating factor level of <1%. The median FVIII infusion dose was 26 (range: 16-33) IU kg(-1); infusions were administered > or = x 3 per week in 67% of cases. High-dose factor prophylaxis was used most frequently in boys <5 years of age (23 of 28 cases, 82%) as compared with 56% (56 of 100), 66% (40 of 61) and 62% (36 of 58) of males ages 5-12, 13-18 and >18 years. Prophylaxis accounted for 50% of the annual Canadian FVIII consumption and was a major driving force in the 10% increase (=19.3 million FVIII IU) in the FVIII consumption in Canada in the 4-year period 1999-2003. Given the economic implications of increased use of prophylaxis prospective studies are warranted to better define optimal prophylaxis regimens in the haemophilia A population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".