MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2062234236 · doi:10.1109/sofe.2013.6635379

Radio frequency additional heating systems issues for the TORE-SUPRA WEST project

2013· article· en· W2062234236 on OpenAlexfundno aff
D. Guilhem, A. Argouarch, Jean‐Michel Bernard, F. Bouquey, L. Colas, L. Delpech, F. Durodié, A. Ekedahl, Jan van Helvoirt, J. Hillairet, E. Joffrin, X. Litaudon, R. Magne, D. Milanesio, J. Moerel, P. Mollard, E. Wittebol, J. Achard, A. Armitano, G. Berger-By, N. Charabot, M. Goniche, J. Jacquot, G. Lombard, M. Prou, Elodie Traisnel-Corbel, Robert J. Volpe, K. Vulliez

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Circulatory and Respiratory HealthEUROfusion
KeywordsTore SupraTokamakNuclear engineeringDivertorDielectric heatingRadio frequencyCyclotronRF power amplifierPlasmaMaterials scienceElectron cyclotron resonanceSuperconducting magnetNuclear physicsHeliumMagnetPhysicsAtomic physicsElectrical engineeringOptoelectronicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This year TORE-SUPRA celebrated its 25 years of operation. During this long time a number of technologies have been developed [1]. First of all it was mandatory to develop reliable superconducting magnets at ~ - 4 K, with superfluid helium as efficient coolant. For the production of steady state discharge, 3 types of Radio Frequency (RF) additional heating systems have been developed: Lower Hybrid Current Drive (LHCD), Ion Cyclotron Resonance Heating (ICRH) and Electron Cyclotron Resonance Heating (ECRH) [2]. To cope with long lasting discharges (up to 380 s × 2.8 MW) and large RF additional heating power (12.3 MW × 3 s), Actively Cooled (AC) Plasma Facing Components (PFC) were deployed in TORE-SUPRA for the first time in a Tokamak environment. TORE-SUPRA is now being modified into an axisymmetric tokamak with actively cooled tungsten main chamber walls and a divertor, the WEST project (W - for tungsten - Environment in Steady-state Tokamak) [3]. This new facility has the objective to offer ITER a test bed for validating the relevant actively cooled metallic technologies in D-shape H-mode plasmas. In contrast to other metallic devices such as JET and ASDEX, WEST will rely only on RF additional power systems. A set of plasma scenarios have been identified, ranging from a high total RF power scenario up to 15 MW during 30 seconds, to a high fluence scenario of 1000 seconds with up to 10 MW of injected RF power. These scenarios are able to reproduce ITER relevant conditions of steady state heat loads of 10 to 20 MW/m2, to test tungsten actively cooled divertor technologies with relevant power heat fluxes and particle fluence. The paper presents the main issues regarding WEST project and especially the additional RF power injection systems (2 LHCD antennas, 3 + 4 = 7 MW continuous wave and 3 ICRH antennas, 3 × 3 = 9 MW-30 s or 3 MW-1000 s) for WEST. The front face of the LHCD antennas will be modified to account for the different plasma position and smaller toroidal field ripple, due to the more inward antenna position in the vessel. No other modifications are needed on the Passive-Active Multijunction (PAM) or the Fully-Active Multijunction (FAM) LHCD antennas, or the associated generator (2 × 8 klystrons, 600 kW each CW). Concerning the ICRH system, the main challenges are its ELM-resilience, its compatibility with continuous operation, and the interaction of the RF near fields with neighbouring plasma facing components. 3 new actively cooled antennas are being designed to be matched with an ELMs resilient electric circuit. The proposed solution is based on the JET-EP antenna and CEA prototype tested in 2007, both having identical internal conjugate-T electrical layout and a demonstrated load resilience capacity to plasma edge transients during ELMs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→