The Versatile, Efficient, and Stereoselective Self‐Assembly of Transition‐Metal Helicates by Using Hydrogen‐Bonds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A diverse range of dinuclear double-stranded helicates in which the ligand strand is built up by using hydrogen-bonding has been synthesized. The helicates, formulated as [Co(2)(L)(2)(L-H)(2)X(2)], readily self-assemble from a mixture of a suitable pyridine-alcohol compound (L; for example, 6-methylpyridine-2-methanol, 1), and a CoX(2) salt in the presence of base. Nine such helicates have been characterized by X-ray crystallography. For helicates derived from the same pyridine-alcohol precursor, a remarkable regularity was found for both the molecular structure and the crystal packing arrangements, regardless of the nature of the ancillary ligand (X). A notable exception was observed in the solid-state structure of [Co(2)(1)(2)(1-H)(2)(NCS)(2)] for which intermolecular nonbonded contacts between the sulfur atoms (SS=3.21 A) lead to the formation of 1D chains. Helicates derived from (R)-6-methylpyridine-2-methanol (2) are soluble in solvents such as CH(3)CN and CH(2)Cl(2), and their self-assembly could be monitored in solution by (1)H NMR, UV/Vis, and CD titrations. No intermediate complexes were observed to form in a significant concentration at any point throughout these titrations. The global thermodynamic stability constant of [Co(2)(2)(2)(2-H)(2)(NO(3))(2)] was calculated from spectrophotometric data to be logbeta=8.9(8). The stereoisomerism of these helicates was studied in some detail and the self-assembly process was found to be highly stereoselective. The chirality of the ligand precursors can control the absolute configuration of the metal centers and thus the overall helicity of the dinuclear assemblies. Furthermore, the enantiomers of rac-6-methylpyridine-2-methanol (3) undergo a self-recognition process to form exclusively homochiral helicates in which the four pyridine-alcohol units possess the same chirality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".