Prognostic Value of CT Angiography in Patients with Suspected Vertebrobasilar Ischemia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The outcome of vertebrobasilar ischemia depends on the clinical presentation and the presence or absence of vascular occlusion. The aim of our study was to analyze the CT angiography (CTA) predictors of outcome in patients with suspected vertebrobasilar ischemia. METHODS: We studied patients with suspected acute vertebrobasilar ischemia between April 2002 and January 2006 and had CTA done within 24 hours of symptom onset. We reviewed the final diagnosis and 3-month follow-up and analyzed the clinical and CTA predictors of outcome. RESULTS: Of the 133 patients, 21(15%), 18 (13%), and 16 (12%) had occlusion of basilar artery (BA), vertebral artery (VA), and posterior cerebral artery (PCA) respectively. The final diagnosis was stroke in 98 (73.6%), transient ischemic attack (TIA) in 10 (7.5%), and nonischemic in 25 (18.8%). No vascular occlusion was seen on CTA in patients with TIA and nonischemic diagnosis. At 3-month follow-up, we found a mortality rate of 10.6% and good functional outcome in 71.4%. The predictors of death in the multivariable analysis were the presence of BA occlusion (odds ratio[OR] 6.7, 95% CI, 1.4-30.6) and baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (OR 1.14, 95% CI, 1.06-1.2). When patients with basilar occlusion were excluded, the presence of VA occlusion (OR 6.5, 95% CI, 1.34-31.4), age (OR 1.09, 95% CI, 1.03-1.14), and baseline NIHSS (OR 1.1, 95% CI, 1.03-1.18) predicted poorer outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The presence or absence of a vascular occlusion is a critical factor for prognosis in suspected acute vertebrobasilar ischemia and is correlated with the location of occlusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it