Noncatalytic hydrogenation of natural rubber latex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Hydrogenation is an important method of chemical modification, which improves the physical, chemical, and thermal properties of diene‐based elastomers. Natural rubber latex (NRL) could be hydrogenated to a strictly alternating ethylene–propylene copolymer using diimide generated in an in situ system. The diimide generated using the in situ technique for hydrogenation of NRL was accomplished by thermolysis of p‐toluenesulfonyl hydrazide (TSH). A molar ratio of TSH to double bonds equal to 2 : 1 was found to be the optimum ratio to provide a high percentage of hydrogenation. 95% Degree of saturation of NRL was achieved in o‐xylene. Hydrogenated products are characterized by FTIR and NMR spectroscopy. The thermal stability of hydrogenated rubber was improved as shown from the results of thermogravimetric analysis. From the differential scanning calorimetry measurement, the glass transition temperature of the hydrogenated product did not appear to change. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 103: 2885–2895, 2007
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".