Gene expression profiles during embryo development in <i>Brassica napus</i>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The seed in angiosperms is produced through coordinated development of the embryo, endosperm and seed coat. In dicots, most of the seed mass is taken up by the embryo with nutritional reserves stored in the cotyledons. During embryogenesis, well‐coordinated developmental and genetic programmes establish the embryonic body plan, and the associated complex metabolic pathways result in the production of diverse nutrients and deposition of important seed storage reserves. To gain insights into the genetic programmes that operate during embryo development in B rassica napus L. (canola), an important oilseed crop, we performed gene and protein expression analyses. We used the key stages from single‐cell zygote to mature embryo to generate comprehensive EST and proteome data sets. Analysis of these data sets identified 20 183 genes and 2607 proteins that are differentially expressed across different stages of embryo development. B . napus genes share high degree of homology with A rabidopsis and display stage‐specific and shared expression patterns associated with developmental and metabolic pathways. Together, this study has generated useful new molecular and genomic resources for embryo development in B . napus .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it