MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062387829 · doi:10.1149/1.2158573

Cathodic Potential Oscillations of Sn(II) Reduction and Hydrogen Evolution in Acid Stannous Sulfate Solutions

2006· article· en· W2062387829 on OpenAlexaff
Shixue Wen, Jerzy A. Szpunar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrochemical Analysis and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLimiting currentChemistryCathodic protectionCurrent densityCathodeOscillation (cell signaling)GelatinHydrogenLimitingInorganic chemistryCurrent (fluid)SulfateAnodeCyclic voltammetryVoltammetryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ElectrochemistryElectrodeThermodynamicsPhysical chemistryChromatographyOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cathodic potential oscillations of Sn(II) reduction and hydrogen evolution in acid stannous sulfate solutions were investigated by cyclic voltammetry under galvanostatic conditions and chronopotentiometry. The potential oscillations are observed when the applied current density is above the limiting value, and they are observed only at low current scan rates and at constant current density. In the absence of gelatin, damped potential oscillations are evident. This is attributed to a dendritic growth, which increases the surface area and reduces the current density below the limiting value. Sustained potential oscillation can be achieved with gelatin, where a smooth deposit is expected due to an inhibitory effect and∕or absorption of gelatin on the cathode surface. It has been found that gelatin has the effect of extending the lifespan of the potential oscillations. In order to have sustained potential oscillations, the deposits on the cathode should be smooth so that the effective current density remains higher than the limiting value.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicElectrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207