MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062392712 · doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(01)01017-3

Laser in situ keratomileusis with a scanning excimer laser for the correction of low to moderate myopia with and without astigmatism

2001· article· en· W2062392712 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gordon Balazsi, Marc Mullie, Lynn Lasswell, Patti A. Lee, Yi-Jung Duh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCorneal surgery and disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKeratomileusisMicrokeratomeLASIKMedicineEmmetropiaDioptreAstigmatismOphthalmologyNomogramPatient satisfactionRefractive errorVisual acuityCorneal topographySurgeryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of and patient satisfaction with laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) performed with a scanning excimer laser by experienced surgeons to correct low and moderate levels of myopia and astigmatism. SETTING: Clinique Laservue, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. METHODS: A consecutive series of 125 patients (236 eyes) with myopia of -0.5 to -7.0 diopters (D) and cylinder less than 2.5 D were enrolled in this single-center prospective clinical trial. The patients were treated with LASIK and followed for 6 months. The System-ALK Automated Corneal Shaper microkeratome (Bausch & Lomb Surgical) with a 180 microm thickness plate and the Technolas 217 excimer laser (Bausch & Lomb Surgical) with PlanoScan software for the stromal ablation were used in all procedures. Since this version of PlanoScan tended to undercorrect, a mean of 14.7% was added to the standard nomogram. Patient satisfaction was assessed by questionnaires administered preoperatively and 1 and 6 months postoperatively. Retreatments for enhancement were not performed during the 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Six months after LASIK (86.4% follow-up), the mean postoperative manifest spherical equivalent was +0.02 D +/- 0.64 (SD) compared with a preoperative mean of -4.01 +/- 1.59 D. The uncorrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 94.6% of eyes and 20/20 or better in 81.9%. A total of 91.2% were within +/-1.0 D of emmetropia and 73.0% were within +/-0.5 D. Only 2 eyes were overcorrected by >1.0 D. Of the eyes with astigmatic myopia, 86.8% were within +/-1.0 D of the intended cylinder correction (by vector analysis) and 73.0% were within +/-0.5 D. The refractions were generally stable after 1 month, and the change in refraction between postoperative examinations was within +/-0.5 D in 88.0% of eyes. A 1-line decrease in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was seen in 11.3% of eyes, and no eye lost more than 1 line. An increase of 1 or 2 lines was seen in 45.1%. No intraoperative problems occurred, and the interface was clear in all eyes. At 6 months, most symptoms present significantly more frequently than preoperatively were "mild"; none were "marked" or "severe." A total of 90.5% of eyes were reported with marked to extreme improvement in the overall quality of vision, and 99.0% of patients said they would choose LASIK surgery again. CONCLUSIONS: Mild to moderate myopia, with and without astigmatism, was corrected safely, effectively, and predictably with a high degree of patient satisfaction using LASIK with a scanning excimer laser and the System-ALK Automated Corneal Shaper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cataract & Refractive SurgerySame topicCorneal surgery and disordersFrench-language works237,207