MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062487887 · doi:10.1353/cat.2007.0173

Église et pouvoir dans la Péninsule Ibérique. Les ordres militaires dans le royaume de Castille (1252-1369) (review)

2007· article· fr· W2062487887 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Francisco Javier Hernández

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œCatholic historical review · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Iberian Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesCONQUESTArtHistoryAncient history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Église et pouvoir dans la Péninsule Ibérique. Les ordres militaires dans le royaume de Castille (1252-1369) Francisco J. Hernández Église et pouvoir dans la Péninsule Ibérique. Les ordres militaires dans le royaume de Castille (1252-1369). By Philippe Josserand. [Bibliothèque de la Casa de Velázquez, Volume 31.] (Madrid: Casa de Velázquez. 2004. Pp. xxii, 912. €56.00.) The "Great Reconquest" placed most of Islamic southern Spain under Christian rule, doubled the size of Castile-Leon in the process, and was capped with the occupation of Seville in 1248. The Latin Chronicle describes how it had began twenty-four years earlier, when young king Fernando III (1217-1252) unexpectedly decided to attack his southern neighbors. But first he sought the advice of the masters of Calatrava and Santiago, the Spanish Military Orders founded half a century earlier. Only then did he summon his vassal army and, together with the Orders, marched against the South (Chronica latina regum Castellae, ed. C. Brea [Turnhout, 1997]; §44). As the conquest progressed, the armed friars received huge territories from the Crown, rewards that climaxed when Calatrava, Santiago, Alcantara, the Hospitalers, and the Templars obtained a significant share of the Seville farmlands allotted by Fernando III before his death in 1252. Josserand begins his study of the Castilian Military Orders at this point, when their main raison d'être seemed to vanish as "reconquest" seemed no [End Page 389] longer possible or necessary. He then traces their fortunes over the hundred plus years which span the reigns of Alfonso the Wise (1252-1284) and his last legitimate descendant, Peter the Cruel (1350-1369). From the start he adopts a justified and refreshing polemical stance. He rejects the notion of decadence often applied to the Orders at this period and shows instead how they managed to adapt to their new conditions, moving from conquest to defense, from monastic to a secular ethos, from a predatory war economy to one based on the encomienda system—later to be exported and adapted in the Americas. Had they remained faithful to their origins, the Orders would have imploded. Instead, Josserand shows how they refashioned themselves after 1252, maintaining their social relevance as sentinels against Islam. And then, when a succession of dynastic conflicts weakened the Crown in 1282-1326, they attracted the younger children of noble families and were embraced by the aristocracy. Contrary to received wisdom, the book argues that the Orders' scope of action on the Castilian political stage was enhanced, rather than diminished at this time. Their own success, in turn, made them a force too powerful to be ignored by the Crown. Alfonso X, whose saintly father was not above meddling in episcopal elections, had no qualms about placing loyal servants at the heads of Orders which remained ecclesiastical in nature. The dynastic troubles of 1282-1326 partially interrupted the trend, but it regained momentum with Alfonso XI and continued unabated under his son with the enthusiastic acquiescence of the fighting friars. They had by now lost most of their original identity, but had grown richer with the encomiendas, worldlier with the nobility, and more powerful under the Crown's tutelage. As the Modern Era was about to dawn, they were fully awake and ready to go. This masterful book shakes up many historiographic myths and brilliantly illuminates an area of Spanish history woefully unattended until now. Église et pouvoir represents an exhaustive survey and revision of earlier scholarship, with a bibliography of more than one hundred and thirty pages, and, more importantly, a fresh reappraisal of the evidence, represented by many literary texts and over six thousand documents, many previously unpublished or little used. Josserand responsibly shifts, synthesizes, and often surpasses his predecessors, who are thoughtfully challenged with original evidence when warranted. Judicious and convenient footnotes firmly anchor his arguments. As a final gift, the author offers an edition of the Order of Santiago's earliest preserved statutes, well known to scholars, but inexplicably never printed before. Francisco J. Hernández Carleton University, Ottawa Copyright © 2007 The Catholic University of America Press

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œCatholic historical reviewSame topicMedieval Iberian StudiesFrench-language works237,207