MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062505601 · doi:10.1021/bi062080a

Heat-Induced Dimerization of BCL-x<sub>L</sub> through α-Helix Swapping

2006· article· en· W2062505601 on OpenAlexaff
A. Yu. Denisov, Tara Sprules, J. Fraser, Guennadi Kozlov, Kalle Gehring

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell death mechanisms and regulation
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDimerChemistryResidual dipolar couplingHelix (gastropod)CrystallographyBcl-xLNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyMonomerStereochemistryPolymerBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dimerization of anti-apoptotic BCL-xL by three-dimensional domain swapping has recently been discovered at alkaline pH; however, the high energetic barrier between the dimer and monomer forms of BCL-xL prevents them from interconverting at room temperature and neutral pH. Here, we demonstrate that BCL-xL dimers can be easily prepared by heating concentrated protein above 50 degrees C. The 38 kDa BCL-xL dimer was fully characterized by multi-resonance nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, and the mechanism of dimerization by alpha-helix swapping was confirmed. Dimerization strongly affects the NMR signals from the turn between helices alpha5 and alpha6 of BCL-xL and a portion of the long loop between helices alpha1 and alpha2. Measurements of residual dipolar couplings demonstrate that the solution structure of the BCL-xL dimer is very close to the crystal structure. Dimer formation does not prevent tight binding of ligands to the hydrophobic cleft of BCL-xL; however, binding of a BID BH3-peptide or a polyphenol drug, gossypol, to BCL-xL significantly slowed monomer-dimer interconversion and is an example of the control of BCL protein oligomerization by ligand binding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.685

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistrySame topicCell death mechanisms and regulationFrench-language works237,207