MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Effects Of An Aging Pulmonary System On Expiratory Flow Limitation Susceptibility During Exercise In Healthy Women

2010· article· en· W2062531707 on OpenAlexaff
Sabrina S. Reeve, Paolo B. Dominelli, A. William Sheel, Jordan A. Guenette

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyLung volumesElastic recoilResidual volumeBronchodilationFunctional residual capacityInternal medicineVentilation (architecture)Lung functionRespiratory minute volumeVital capacityPhysical therapyRespiratory systemLungDiffusing capacityAsthmaBronchodilator

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aging is associated with a decline in lung function, primarily because of a loss of elastic recoil which acts to reduce maximal expiratory flow rates. Aging related changes in pulmonary function might make older women more susceptible to developing expiratory flow limitation (EFL) relative to their younger counterparts, despite having lower levels of minute ventilation (VE) during exercise. PURPOSE: To determine if there are aging related differences in the susceptibility and severity of EFL during exercise in healthy women. METHODS: Healthy young (YW; n=8; 29±7 (20-39) yrs) and old (OW; n=8; 64±3 (60-68) yrs) women participated in this study and were matched for %predicted forced vital capacity (115±5 vs. 122±14 %, respectively, P>0.05) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (104±7 vs. 108±20 %, respectively, P>0.05). EFL was calculated as the percent overlap between tidal flow-volume loops during maximal exercise and the maximal expiratory flow-volume (MEFV) curve. The MEFV curve was generated by having subjects perform several expirations from total lung capacity to residual volume at different efforts before and after exercise to account for both thoracic gas compression and exercise-induced bronchodilation. RESULTS: Maximal O2 consumption was lower in the OW (29.4±3.6 ml·kg-1·min-1) compared to the YW (49.1±8.9 ml·kg-1·min-1, P<0.05). Maximal VE during exercise was also lower in the OW (73.7±18.4 l·min-1) compared to the YW (108.7±14.1 l·min-1, P<0.05). EFL at maximal exercise was present in 2 of 8 YW (25%) and in 5 of 8 OW (63%). There were no differences in the magnitude of EFL between OW (23±24 (0-69) %EFL) and YW (9±18 (0-46) %EFL, P>0.05). The magnitude of EFL in OW appeared to be inversely related to %predicted forced vital capacity (r=-0.70, P=0.05). CONCLUSION: OW tend to be more susceptible to EFL than YW despite having lower levels of VE during exercise. Funding by: BC Lung Association and NSERC

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research→French-language works237,207→