MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062539252 · doi:10.1080/01140671.2010.495374

Evaluation of plant extracts for tomato late blight control in Cameroon

2010· article· en· W2062539252 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Piebiep Goufo, D. A. Fontem, David Ngnokam

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogens and Resistance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgence Universitaire de la Francophonie
KeywordsBlightPhytophthora infestansBiologyFungicideHorticultureMetalaxylGerminationAlternaria solaniBotanyAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Late blight caused by Phytophthora infestans is the most important disease of tomato in Cameroon. Three experiments are conducted to assess the fungitoxicity of methylene chloride/methanol leaf extracts of seven plants on P. infestans development . The extracts (3%) are evaluated for sporangial germination inhibition, latent and incubation periods, lesion size and late blight severity on tomato plants. Inoculated leaflets and plants are incubated in the greenhouse at 21°C during the day and 18°C during the night, with a 12 h photoperiod and for 7 days. Sporangial germination is significantly inhibited by Tephrosia vogelli and Entandrophragma angolense extracts, while disease progression is highly limited by Ageratum houstonianum, Tephrosia vogelli, Clausena anisata and Entandrophragma angolense extracts. The fungitoxic effects of some of the extracts is comparable to synthetic fungicides, metalaxyl and maneb, used as positive controls, indicating their potential as components of an integrated pathogen management programme for tomato late blight. Eucalyptus saligna , Deinbollia saligna and Garcinia smeathmannii extracts have low efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score0.136

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural ScienceSame topicPlant Pathogens and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207