Synthesis, photophysics, and electrochemistry of thiophene–pyridine and thiophene–pyrimidine dyad comonomers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of new π-conjugated donor (D) and acceptor (A) dyad comonomers were prepared using Suzuki coupling protocols. The D–A comonomers consisting of thiophene/bithiophene as donors and pyridine/pyrimidine as acceptors were prepared to investigate their photophysical and electrochemical properties. The dyads were spectroscopically confirmed to be highly conjugated. This was further supported by the X-ray crystal structure of the bithophene–pyridine dyad that showed all the heterocycles to be coplanar. It was further found that the fluorescence yields (Φ fl ) of the dyads were highly dependent on the number of thiophenes. The bithiophene derivatives exhibited Φ fl values ≥ 0.3 while the thiophene derivatives did not fluoresce. The suppressed fluorescence observed for the thiophene derivatives was due to their higher triplet energy resulting in efficient intersystem crossing (ISC) to the triplet state with Φ ISC ≥ 0.8. This was confirmed both by time-resolved and steady-state measurements. The singlet excited state of both thiophene and bithiophene dyads was deactivated solely by either fluorescence and (or) ISC. Owing to their donor and acceptor character, the dyads could be oxidized and reduced both electrochemically and photochemically to afford the radical cation and anion, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".