Sleep arousal response to experimental thermal stimulation during sleep in human subjects free of pain and sleep problems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although the interaction between sleep and pain is generating considerable interest (NIH Technology Assessment Panel, 1996), it is still unknown if chronic pain is the cause or effect of poor sleep. To further this understanding, subjects free of pain and sleep problems need to be studied in order to assess their response to pain during sleep, defined as a behavioral and a physiological state in which sensory processing is altered. (For example, while auditory perception remains active, other sensory inputs are facilitated, attenuated, or suppressed (Velluti, 199746 degrees C) was statistically greater in the lighter sleep stage 2 (48.3%) than in the deeper stages 3&4 (27.9%). A nocifensive behavioral-motor response was associated with only 2.5% of the 351 heat pain stimuli. Two other markers of sleep quality-sleep stage shift and awakening-were not influenced by the thermal stimuli. None of the subjects demonstrated any burns in the morning following the thermal stimulations applied during sleep. We conclude that the processing of nociceptive inputs is attenuated across sleep stages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it