MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2062611997 · doi:10.1118/1.3612328

SU‐E‐T‐374: Use of the Novel RadPos System for In‐Vivo Dose Verification in Gynaecological Brachytherapy Treatment

2011· article· en· W2062611997 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brigitte Reniers, Guillaume Landry, R. Eichner, H. Abdelbasset, Frank Verhaegen

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImaging phantomDosimeterDosimetryBrachytherapyMonte Carlo methodDose profileMedical physicsDetectorMedical imagingNuclear medicineMaterials sciencePhysicsBiomedical engineeringComputer scienceOpticsRadiation therapyMedicineMathematicsRadiologyArtificial intelligenceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Due to the increase of treatment complexity related to the improvement of optimization techniques and new model‐based dose calculation algorithms, high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy with Ir‐192 would benefit from in vivo dosimetry to ensure correct dose delivery. Metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFET) have been proposed as in vivo dosimeters due to their small sensitive volume and direct readout. The prototype RADPOS system (Best Medical Canada) consists of a MOSFET dosimeter physically coupled to a position‐sensing probe, which deduces its 3D position in static magnetic fields generated by an emitter. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of the positioning device and the feasibility of Ir‐192 in vivo dosimetry with the RADPOS system.Methods: Using a PMMA phantom, the positioning accuracy of the RADPOS system was assessed by comparing position readouts with the known position of the detector along the X, Y and Z axes. RADPOS dose measurements were performed at several distances from a Nucletron Ir‐192 source in a PMMA phantom. The photon spectrum at each distance from the Ir‐192 source was calculated using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations to determine the energy response of the micro‐MOSFET used in the RADPOS system. With this knowledge the RADPOS system can be used at arbitrary positions in a PMMA phantom in order to evaluate the delivered dose for realistic plans. Results: Positioning accuracy was found to be within 1mm in the 1–10 cm range from the source, meeting the requirements for in vivo dosimetry. Similar results are obtained for positions along the 3 axes. Calibration factors were determined at different distances from the source to evaluate the energy dependence of the micro‐MOSFET. Conclusions: Combining accurate 3D positioning data and dose measurements, the RADPOS system shows promise as an in vivo dosimetry system for HDR brachytherapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Physics→Same topicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques→French-language works237,207→