MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062782934 · doi:10.1103/physreve.72.051927

Multistability of reentrant rhythms in an ionic model of a two-dimensional annulus of cardiac tissue

2005· article· en· W2062782934 on OpenAlexafffund
Philippe Comtois, Alain Vinet

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité de MontréalMcGill University Health CentreMontreal Heart Institute
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsAnnulus (botany)Quasiperiodic functionReentryBifurcationPhysicsQuasiperiodicityCurvatureMechanicsRADIUSClassical mechanicsCondensed matter physicsMathematicsGeometryMaterials scienceNonlinear systemQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dynamics of reentry in a model of a two-dimensional annulus of homogeneous cardiac tissue, with a Beeler-Reuter type formulation of the membrane ionic currents, is examined. The bifurcation structure of the sustained propagated solutions is described as a function of Rin and Rout, the inner and outer radii of the annulus. The transition from periodic to quasiperiodic reentry occurs at a critical Rin, which first diminishes and then saturates as Rout is increased. The reduction of the critical Rin is a consequence of the increase of the wave-front curvature. There is a range of Rin below the critical radius in which two distinct quasiperiodic solutions coexist. Each of these solutions disappears at its own specific value of Rin, and their annihilation is preceded by a new type of bifurcation leading to a regime of propagation with transient successive detachments of the wave front from the inner border of the annulus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ESame topicNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern FormationFrench-language works237,207