MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062827512 · doi:10.4141/a01-024

Transfer of omega-3 linolenic acid and linoleic acid to milk fat from flaxseed or Linola protected with formaldehyde

2001· article· en· W2062827512 on OpenAlexaffvenue
J. Goodridge, J. R. Ingalls, G. H. Crow

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Animal Science · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFatty Acid Research and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationOhio State University
KeywordsFood scienceLinoleic acidChemistryFatty acidLatin squareLinolenic acidConjugated linoleic acidStearic acidBiochemistryRumenFermentation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Four Holstein cows were randomly assigned to four treatments in a 4 × 4 Latin square design. The primary objective of this study was to measure the transfer and increased level of omega-3 fatty acid C18:3 in milk by feeding sup plemental protected fat from flax and, second, to measure the transfer and increase in level of C18:2 by feeding supplemental protected fat from linola. The four dietary treatments were total mixed rations (TMR) plus i) control-no added fat, ii) high levels of protected Linola containing high linoleic acid content, iii) low level of protected flax containing high linoleic acid content and iv) high levels of protected flax containing high linolenic acid content. Linola is a variety of Solin containing approximately 74% linoleic acid, which was developed from flax. These supplements were added to the diet as a top dress and provided 454 g fat (high level) from the protected Linola product, 187 g fat (low level) from the protected flax product and 410 g fat (high level) from the protected flax product. Treatments had no effect on feed intake, milk yield or milk content of fat, protein or solids not fat. Medium chain fatty acids, C12:0 to C16:0, were significantly lower (P < 0.05) in the milk of cows fed supplemental fat. Milk stearic acid (C18:0) was significantly greater in the milk fat from cows fed Linola vs. control, but was unaffected by other dietary treatments. Milk linoleic acid (C18:2) was significantly higher at 10.3% in the milk of cows fed the protected Linola vs. the control at 4.8%. Linolenic acid (C18:3) was not affected by feeding Linola, but was significantly greater in the milk of cows fed the high level of protected flax (6.4% vs. 0.8% in the control). This represents an eightfold increase, while the low level of protected flax diet increased C18:3 by 3.9-fold in milk fat. Supplementing dairy cow diets with a formaldehyde-treated flax product at acceptable levels of fat for high producing cows results in a milk fat high in omega-3-linolenic acid. Key words: Flaxseed, cow, milk, fatty acids, linoleic acid, linolenic acid

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.205
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Animal ScienceSame topicFatty Acid Research and HealthFrench-language works237,207