Modeling of Lithium Interference in Cadmium Biosorption
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biosorption of Cd by the brown seaweed Sargassum polycystum biomass was experimentally investigated and mathematically modeled at different pH and ionic strength levels. From the potentiometric titration of the biomass, three types of functional groups were identified, and the dissociation constant and the numbers of these groups were determined. The carboxyl group (pK(H) 3.70 +/- 0.09) was found to play a major role in binding protons and Cd. The background ion, Li+, could interfere with the uptake of protons and Cd by competition forthe carboxyl sites. Whereas the binding mechanism on the carboxyl group was established as an ion exchange process, the second functional group, phosphonate (pK(H) 5.41 +/- 0.31), most likely bound metals by a complexation reaction. A biosorption model was developed based upon the binding mechanisms and was successfully used for predicting the isotherm and pH edge experiments. In addition, the speciation of the binding sites as a function of the pH was simulated using the developed model in order to visualize the distribution of Cd on the binding sites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".