Midsummer plankton development along a large temperate river: the St. Lawrence River
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Midsummer planktonic communities were sampled in 1997 along a 425-km reach of the St. Lawrence River between Lake Ontario and Trois-Rivières (Quebec) to describe longitudinal patterns of plankton development. Chlorophyll a (Chl a) quickly declined as water flowed from Lake Ontario into the river. Thereafter, in the reach upstream from Montreal, Chl a was ~1 µg·L-1and total phosphorus (TP) was ~10 µg·L-1. Downstream from Montreal, TP increased to 20-40 µg·L-1and Chl a rose to 2-5 µg·L-1. Although Chl a increased concomitant with TP, phytoplankton may have been light limited at the more turbid downstream stations. Zooplankton biomass decreased from 40 µg dry mass·L-1in Lake Ontario to 16 µg dry mass·L-1at Brockville, 90 km downstream. Zooplankton biomass continued to decline and downstream from Montreal remained <10 µg dry mass·L-1, despite the increased TP and Chl a. Rotifers dominated the zooplankton community, but as in other temperate rivers, total zooplankton biomass was low (<10 µg dry mass·L-1). There was no longitudinal pattern in heterotrophic bacterial or flagellate abundance. A comparison of the inflow and outflow biomass of two fluvial lakes showed the lakes to contribute little to the downstream river plankton during summer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".