Long Term Corrosion Behaviour of Carbon Steel During Anaerobic to Aerobic Cycling Under Near-Neutral pH Saline Conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates the long term corrosion behaviour of pretreated carbon steel under alternating anaerobic to aerobic cycles over 238 days. Changes in steel behaviour were observed electrochemically by monitoring the corrosion potential, and calculating changes to corrosion rate from linear polarization resistance. With increasing cycle number the corrosion process becomes localized at a small number of locations, consistent with the formation of tubercles. Periods of aerobic corrosion were associated with more positive potentials (between −500 mV to −350 mV) and high corrosion rates (70 to 120 μm yr−1); whereas anaerobic corrosion yielded more negative potentials (< −650 mV) and lower corrosion rates (40 to 50 μm yr−1). Upon termination of the experiment, corrosion product deposits were characterized by several techniques: scanning electrochemical microscopy to detect morphology; focused ion beam and cross sectioning to judge film thickness and film porosity; and Raman Spectroscopy to identify iron phases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".