Symptomatic high frequency/acceleration vestibular loss: consideration of a new clinical syndrome of vestibular dysfunction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CONCLUSION: Symptomatic high frequency/acceleration vestibular loss is a distinct clinical entity that can be missed on conventional ENG with caloric testing. Under certain circumstances, symptomatic patients with a high frequency/acceleration vestibular loss should undergo an MSSC study for confirmation, if required. OBJECTIVE: To document that normal electronystagmography (ENG) with conventional bithermal caloric testing is inadequate for diagnosing clinically significant high frequency/acceleration vestibular loss. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with clinical symptoms and signs of persistent peripheral vestibular dysfunction despite normal conventional bithermal caloric testing on ENG underwent high frequency/acceleration horizontal magnetic scleral search coil (MSSC) eye movement studies. The clinical findings and results from audiometric tests, conventional ENG with bithermal caloric tests and MSSC tests were reviewed. RESULTS: Eleven patients were identified as having an abnormal MSSC study, indicating a high frequency/acceleration vestibular loss consistent with their clinical history despite normal or equivocal bithermal caloric responses on conventional ENG. Although valuable, ENG caloric testing evaluates lateral semicircular canal function and should be considered a non-physiological test primarily of low frequency vestibular function. High frequency/acceleration head thrust testing clinically detected a "high frequency/acceleration vestibular loss" in 8/11(72.7%) cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".