MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062900117 · doi:10.1159/000126110

Differences in Extracellular Calcium Involvement Mediating the Secretion of Gonadotropin and Growth Hormone Stimulated by Two Closely Related Endogenous GnRH Peptides in Goldfish Pituitary Cells

2008· article· en· W2062900117 on OpenAlex
Richard M. Jobin, John P. Chang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroendocrinology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologyVerapamilNicardipineGonadotropin-releasing hormoneExtracellularGonadotropinEndogenyChemistryCalciumStimulationBiologyHormoneLuteinizing hormoneMedicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two endogenous gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) peptides, salmon GnRH (sGnRH) and chicken GnRH II (cGnRH II), stimulate gonadotropin (GtH) and growth hormone (GH) secretion in the goldfish. The extracellular calcium (e-Ca2+) dependence of the GtH and GH response to the two GnRH peptides were compared using static incubations of dispersed goldfish pituitary cells. Incubation with Ca(2+)-depleted medium (without the addition of Ca2+ salts and in the presence of EGTA) did not alter basal GtH secretion, but reduced the GtH response to sGnRH, and abolished the cGnRH II-induced GtH release. Blockade of e-Ca2+ entry by low concentrations of CoCl2 had no effect on basal GtH secretion but reduced cGnRH II and sGnRH stimulated GtH release when applied at 0.1 and 0.5 mM concentrations, respectively. In general, treatments with voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channel (VSCC) antagonists, verapamil, nifedipine and nicardipine, did not alter basal GtH release but attenuated GnRH-stimulated GtH responses. cGnRH II-induced GtH release was decreased by 10 nM verapamil and 1 nM nifedipine, whereas the reduction of GtH responses to sGnRH required 100 times higher concentrations of these VSCC antagonists. cGnRH II but not sGnRH stimulation of GtH secretion was also abolished by 10 microM nicardipine. In contrast to GtH release, exposure to Ca(2+)-depleted medium reduced basal GH release and abolished the GH responses to both GnRH peptides. sGnRH and cGnRH II-stimulated GH responses were both abolished by 0.1 mM CoCl2, decreased by 1 nM verapamil, and reduced by 10 nM nicardipine. Addition of 0.1 and 10 microM nifedipine inhibited the GH responses to sGnRH and cGnRH II, respectively. Basal GH release was not affected by the VSCC antagonists tested. Results from this study indicate that entry of e-Ca2+, in part through VSCC, is involved in GnRH stimulation of GtH and GH release from goldfish gonadotropes and somatotropes; however, the e-Ca2+ dependence of the GtH and GH responses to the two endogenous GnRHs differ. The stimulatory effects of cGnRH II on GtH secretion is more dependent on and sensitive to e-Ca2+ than sGnRH. Whereas the sensitivity of GH responses to manipulations of e-Ca2+ availability is, in most instances, similar for both GnRH peptides. These results further suggest that basal secretion of GH is more sensitive to e-Ca2+ than basal GtH release; however, VSCC are not involved in the maintenance of basal release of either hormone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.622
Threshold uncertainty score0.970

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it