Cx26 Gene Mutations in Idiopathic Progressive Hearing Loss
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The present study evaluated the frequency and type of mutations throughout the entire GJB2 region in a population of 39 patients affected with sporadic progressive "idiopathic" hearing loss. MATERIAL: A large series of patients suffering from progressive hearing loss underwent a systematic screening program to identify the etiology of the hearing loss. Of these patients, 39 presented with sporadic idiopathic progressive hearing loss and were included in this study. METHOD: We performed molecular analysis of GJB2 in each patient sequencing the genomic deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in both directions for detection of GJB2 mutations. Furthermore, in all patients bearing a Cx26 mutation, a search was also conducted for mutations or deletions of GJB6 (Cx30 gene) and for the A1555G mutation of the mitochondrial DNA. A control group was also considered to evaluate the frequency of Cx26 mutations in the normal population. RESULTS: A Cx26 gene mutation was detected in nine cases. One subject was found to bear a homozygous genotype for the 35delG mutation, another subject was compound heterozygous for 35delG and E47X, and the remaining patients showed heterozygous genotypes (35delG, L90P, R127H, M34T, V153I, V37I). No mutation or delection of the Cx30 gene was observed in these nine patients, and none of them presented with the A1555G mutation in the mitochondrial DNA. In the control group (40 individuals), a Cx26 mutation was detected in two cases (5%). CONCLUSIONS: About 23% of our patients (nine subjects) presented with mutations in GJB2, and 18% (seven subjects) were heterozygous. However, most of the described mutations are recessive, so a monogenic model of inheritance cannot explain the deafness phenotype. On the basis of these findings, we can speculate that the heterozygote Cx26 genotype could be a cause of progressive hearing loss, probably in association with mutations in other alleles. Thus, we recommend carefully following all hearing-impaired subjects with GJB2 mutations, even if they present with only mild hearing loss, because the hearing deficit could worsen. Furthermore, molecular analysis of the Cx26 gene should also be performed in adult patients affected with idiopathic progressive hearing loss.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".